Our firm is about people. That is our motto and that will always be our reality.
We do our best to get to know our clients, understand their situations, and get them the compensation they deserve.
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Without our team, we would’nt be able to provide our clients with anything close to the level of service they receive when they work with us.
The TorHoerman Law Team commits to the sincere belief that those injured by the misconduct of others, especially large corporate profit mongers, deserve justice for their injuries.
Our team is what has made TorHoerman Law a very special place since 2009.
The Ocaliva lawsuit investigation centers on reports that Ocaliva (obeticholic acid) was linked to worsening liver function and severe complications in patients treated for primary biliary cholangitis.
After years of escalating safety concerns, clinical trial data and FDA analyses connected the medication to liver failure, transplants, and death in certain patients, including those without advanced liver disease.
These findings ultimately led to the drug’s withdrawal from the US market in 2025.
TorHoerman Law is actively reviewing potential claims linked to the medication.
The Ocaliva lawsuit investigation centers on years of evidence showing that the drug, marketed by Intercept Pharmaceuticals, posed significant risks to patients treated for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC).
Although the drug works by targeting bile acid regulation, post-marketing data revealed persistent liver problems, rapid progression toward liver cirrhosis, and in some cases life-threatening complications.
Reports also documented instances of serious allergic reaction, worsening hepatic function, and hospitalizations despite the medication’s intended use.
The FDA issued multiple safety communications over time, ultimately adding a boxed warning after linking Ocaliva to severe injuries in both cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients.
As cases continued to emerge, regulators urged patients and healthcare providers to report adverse events, strengthening the evidence base around Ocaliva’s risks.
These findings contributed to the Ocaliva US market withdrawal, ending its availability after the agency determined the benefit–risk profile was no longer acceptable.
TorHoerman Law is actively reviewing potential claims linked to the medication.
Contact us today for a free consultation.
Use the chat feature on this page to find out if you qualify for an Ocaliva lawsuit through a free case evaluation.
The Ocaliva lawsuit investigation focuses on how the drug’s safety profile deteriorated over time, even though it was FDA approved in 2016 as a second-line treatment for adults with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC).
Marketed by Intercept Pharmaceuticals, the medication was designed to regulate bile acid production and support proper function of the bile ducts, but emerging clinical data revealed significant gaps between expected therapeutic benefits and real-world outcomes.
Patients and clinicians reported liver-related complications, rapid disease progression, and other serious health conditions, raising concerns that some risks were not clearly communicated when the drug entered the market.
Ocaliva treatment eventually received the agency’s most serious warning (a boxed warning) after evidence linked the drug to liver failure, transplant, and death in both cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients.
These issues were compounded by concerns about drug interactions, dosing errors, and questionable benefit compared to safer other treatments for PBC that became available later.

The ongoing investigation examines whether Intercept Pharmaceuticals failed to provide adequate risk disclosures, failed to update safety information in a timely manner, or continued promoting the drug despite mounting safety signals across multiple years.
As more injured patients come forward, the legal review continues to evaluate the full scope of harm associated with Ocaliva’s use and the company’s responsibility for those outcomes.
The withdrawal of Ocaliva from the U.S. commercial market followed years of escalating safety concerns, regulatory investigations, and new evidence showing that the medication posed serious liver-related risks for patients treated for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC).
Although the drug was originally approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as a second-line therapy for patients who did not respond adequately to ursodeoxycholic acid, the drug information contained in Ocaliva’s labeling evolved significantly as adverse events accumulated.
Healthcare professionals and patients were repeatedly urged to submit adverse event reports as cases of liver decompensation, transplant, and death were identified in both cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic populations.
In late 2024, a required post-marketing study revealed a higher incidence of liver transplant and death among Ocaliva users compared to placebo, signaling that the risks extended even to patients previously considered appropriate candidates.
After reviewing these findings and other factors affecting the drug’s safety profile, the FDA issued a complete response letter denying full approval and subsequently requested that Intercept remove the drug from the market.

On September 11, 2025, Intercept Pharmaceuticals announced that it would withdraw Ocaliva through a voluntary withdrawal process in direct response to the agency’s request.
Following this announcement, Intercept created an expanded access program to help existing patients transition off the medication while discussing appropriate treatment options with their providers.
The decision reflected a regulatory conclusion that the risks of Ocaliva outweighed its uncertain clinical benefits, marking the end of its availability in the United States.
The medication Ocaliva (obeticholic acid) was once celebrated as a promising therapy for patients with Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) who did not adequately respond to standard treatment.
Yet over time, mounting evidence linked Ocaliva to a spectrum of serious harms, including liver deterioration and organ-failure-type events.
According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, post-market data revealed that even patients without existing liver cirrhosis experienced outcomes such as liver transplant or death at rates higher than placebo.
Media reports echoed this pattern: “The agency identified 20 cases of serious liver damage associated with Ocaliva … including eight listings for transplant and six liver-related deaths.”
Healthcare professionals were urged to monitor liver tests frequently and to watch for signals of worsening liver function in patients on the drug.

Complicating matters, the drug’s manufacturer, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, pursued full approval over several years despite the uncertainty of benefit versus risk shown in confirmatory trials.
The fact that these risks emerged despite the drug being initially approved in 2016 underscores the gravity of the safety concerns.
In short, Ocaliva’s side-effect profile shifted from a hopeful second-line option into a subject of serious injury investigations.
Serious liver injuries associated with Ocaliva have been widely documented in FDA safety communications, clinical trial data, and post-marketing reports.
Many patients began to develop symptoms that signaled sudden declines in liver function, often without clear warning signs in the early stages of treatment.
In several cases, the progression was rapid enough to constitute a medical emergency, requiring hospitalization, transplant evaluation, or life-support measures.
Reports also describe individuals experiencing unexpected weight loss, fatigue, and general health decline as their liver function worsened.
Some patients noted persistent “discomfort, abdominal pain”, which later correlated with significant hepatic impairment upon clinical evaluation.
These findings highlight the severity of liver-related reactions linked to Ocaliva and reinforce why the medication was ultimately withdrawn from the U.S. market.

Examples of documented serious liver injuries include:
Many patients who later experienced significant liver complications reported a pattern of severe early symptoms that appeared before any formal diagnosis was made.
These cases raised concerns about whether a broader medication recall should have been considered earlier in the drug’s lifecycle.
Individuals with varying health history profiles noted the following symptoms, often assuming they were a normal part of their condition rather than early indicators of harm.
In reality, these warning signs frequently required immediate medical care, especially as more information emerged about risks associated with certain FDA approved drug products.
Patients were repeatedly encouraged to immediately report unexpected or worsening symptoms to their providers so that appropriate monitoring and intervention could be arranged.
These reports helped inform the medical community and supported improved decision-making within health care settings.

Common severe symptoms reported before diagnosis included:
There are many other adverse effects associated with Ocaliva (obeticholic acid) beyond the serious liver injuries.
These additional side‐effects are important for potential claimants to understand, because they reflect the broader risk profile of the drug and help show that the harm was not limited to only the most severe outcomes.

Here are some of the additional adverse effects reported:
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a series of Drug Safety Communications (DSCs) about Ocaliva that progressively documented how risk concerns evolved from dosing errors to serious injuries in both cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients.

Taken together, these communications form a clear regulatory record that Ocaliva’s safety profile worsened over time and that the manufacturer and prescribers were repeatedly warned about serious liver injury.
In September 2017, FDA released its first Drug Safety Communication on Ocaliva, warning that some patients with moderate to severe decreases in liver function were being dosed too frequently, which increased the risk of serious liver injury and death.
The agency noted that Ocaliva was being given daily instead of the recommended reduced dosing schedule in patients with hepatic impairment, and that this mis-dosing correlated with cases of severe liver damage and fatalities.
FDA responded by reminding prescribers of the need to adjust Ocaliva dosing based on liver function and called for close monitoring of patients with existing hepatic impairment.
On February 1, 2018, FDA issued an updated communication adding a boxed warning (its strongest label warning) to Ocaliva’s prescribing information.
The agency again emphasized that the drug had been “incorrectly dosed daily instead of weekly” in patients with moderate to severe PBC, which “increased the risk of serious liver injury.”
This DSC clarified recommendations for screening, dosing, monitoring, and managing PBC patients with more advanced liver disease, and explicitly tied the boxed warning to the need for reduced dosing in these groups.
It marked the point where Ocaliva officially carried FDA’s “most serious” label-based warning for liver injury risk.
In May 2021, FDA issued another Drug Safety Communication stating that it was restricting the use of Ocaliva in PBC patients with advanced cirrhosis.
The agency reported that Ocaliva “can cause serious harm” in these patients, including serious liver injury and liver failure, and added a new contraindication for patients with PBC and advanced cirrhosis (e.g., evidence of portal hypertension, a prior decompensation event).
The updated label and Medication Guide reflected these restrictions and instructed clinicians to avoid Ocaliva in advanced cirrhosis and to discontinue treatment if there were signs of disease progression.
Even with these changes, FDA later noted that some patients with advanced cirrhosis were still receiving the drug despite the contraindication, underscoring the ongoing risk environment.
On December 12, 2024, FDA issued a new DSC titled “Serious liver injury being observed in patients without cirrhosis taking Ocaliva”.
After reviewing data from the required confirmatory trial (Study 747-302), FDA reported cases of serious liver injury in PBC patients without cirrhosis, including patients who required liver transplant, and found that the risk was notably higher for those taking Ocaliva compared with placebo.
In this communication, FDA highlighted:
FDA also linked this DSC to Ocaliva’s broader regulatory status: the same data contributed to a Complete Response Letter denying full approval, and the agency signaled that, under the accelerated-approval framework, failure to demonstrate a favorable benefit–risk balance could lead to withdrawal of the drug from the market.
Individuals may qualify for an Ocaliva lawsuit if their medical history and treatment experience show that they were placed at risk by the drug’s evolving safety profile.
Eligibility often depends on whether a patient received Ocaliva for primary biliary cholangitis under dosing or monitoring conditions that later proved unsafe.
Many claims involve people who experienced rapid declines in liver function or unexpected health complications despite following their prescribed regimen.
Others may qualify if they were never informed of the drug’s boxed warning, updated contraindications, or the FDA’s ongoing safety communications.
Families who lost loved ones after sudden liver-related events may also be eligible to pursue a wrongful-death claim.
Individuals whose providers continued Ocaliva despite evidence of liver progression, or prescribed it despite cirrhosis later deemed contraindicated, may have valid legal claims.
Anyone unsure about their situation is encouraged to speak with an attorney for a detailed review of their records and treatment timeline.

You may be eligible if you or a loved one:
Lawyers across the country are actively reviewing potential Ocaliva injury claims, but there are no publicly documented reports yet of injury lawsuits being formally filed in state or federal courts.
Attorneys are evaluating cases involving liver failure, transplant, and death after Ocaliva use, and many firms are advertising that they are accepting clients.
These investigations are based on the FDA’s safety warnings, the drug’s confirmed risk profile, and its eventual withdrawal from the U.S. market.

However, there is not an established multidistrict litigation (MDL) or record of individual civil filings that have entered the court system.
The litigation is currently in the intake and evaluation phase, where attorneys gather medical records and assess eligibility.
Individuals who believe they were harmed by Ocaliva should still speak with an attorney promptly, as early case development is critical even before lawsuits begin appearing on public dockets.
Gathering evidence for an Ocaliva lawsuit requires a clear record of how the medication was prescribed, how symptoms progressed, and how injuries were diagnosed and treated.
Attorneys typically review medical documentation to determine whether Ocaliva contributed to liver decline or other serious health complications.
Evidence also helps establish whether a patient was prescribed the drug despite evolving FDA warnings or contraindications.
The stronger and more complete the documentation, the easier it is to build a reliable timeline of events and show how the injury occurred.

Helpful evidence may include:
Damages represent the financial and personal losses a person suffers after being harmed by a dangerous or defective drug, and they form the basis of the compensation sought in an Ocaliva lawsuit.
Lawyers evaluate these losses by reviewing medical records, treatment costs, long-term health effects, and the broader impact the injury has had on a person’s life.
This assessment helps establish both the economic and non-economic harm caused by the medication.
Attorneys also work with medical experts, financial professionals, and life-care planners to calculate the full extent of damages.
Their goal is to present a clear, evidence-supported claim that advocates for the maximum compensation available under the law.

Potential compensation in Ocaliva lawsuits:
Ocaliva’s withdrawal from the U.S. market marks a turning point for patients and families seeking answers about unexpected liver injuries, transplants, or deaths linked to the medication.
The growing body of evidence (from FDA safety communications to post-marketing trial data) shows that many individuals were exposed to risks they could not have anticipated.
TorHoerman Law is actively investigating these cases and evaluating whether negligent design, inadequate warnings, or delayed safety updates contributed to preventable harm.
Our team is committed to helping injured patients understand their legal rights and determine whether they may be eligible for compensation.

If you or a loved one experienced severe health complications after taking Ocaliva, you are not alone.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, confidential case evaluation and speak with a legal team experienced in defective drug litigation.
Ocaliva was taken off the market after a series of FDA safety reviews showed that the drug posed significant risks of serious liver injury, including liver failure, transplant, and death.
Although it was originally approved under the FDA’s accelerated pathway for patients with primary biliary cholangitis who did not respond to ursodeoxycholic acid, later data revealed that the medication caused harm even in patients without cirrhosis.
A required post-marketing clinical trial found higher rates of liver transplant and death among Ocaliva users compared to placebo, raising concerns that the drug’s benefits did not outweigh its risks.
The FDA had already issued multiple safety warnings, boxed label updates, and strict contraindications in the years leading up to this decision.
In late 2024, the agency concluded that Ocaliva did not meet the standard for full approval and that its risk profile continued to worsen despite previous restrictions.
In September 2025, Intercept Pharmaceuticals agreed to voluntarily withdraw the drug from the U.S. market after the FDA formally requested its removal.
This withdrawal marked the end of Ocaliva’s commercial availability and reflected the agency’s determination that the medication was no longer safe for patient use.
Ocaliva has been linked to a range of serious injuries reported in clinical trials, FDA safety reviews, and post-marketing surveillance.
Many patients experienced rapid deterioration in liver function despite using the medication as prescribed.
These injuries occurred in both cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients, which ultimately contributed to the drug’s withdrawal from the U.S. market.
Evidence from the FDA shows that these complications can progress quickly and may lead to life-threatening outcomes.
Injuries linked to Ocaliva include:
Yes, families can file a wrongful death lawsuit if a loved one died after taking Ocaliva and evidence suggests the medication contributed to the fatal outcome.
These claims typically arise when a patient experienced severe liver complications, rapid disease progression, or sudden decline after beginning the drug.
Wrongful-death cases allow surviving relatives to pursue compensation for medical expenses, funeral costs, loss of financial support, and the emotional impact of the loss.
Attorneys review medical records, treatment history, and FDA safety findings to determine whether Ocaliva played a substantial role in the death.
They also evaluate whether the drug was prescribed despite emerging contraindications or worsening liver function.
Families who believe Ocaliva may have contributed to a loved one’s death should speak with a lawyer to learn whether they qualify to pursue a claim.
If you stopped taking Ocaliva years ago, you may still qualify to file a claim depending on when your injury occurred and how it was discovered.
Many liver-related complications can develop gradually, meaning the connection between the drug and the harm may not become clear until much later.
An attorney can review your medical records to determine whether Ocaliva played a role in your condition, even if significant time has passed.
The key factor is often the date you first learned (or reasonably should have learned) that the injury may have been linked to the medication.
Because deadlines vary by state, speaking with a lawyer promptly is the best way to protect your ability to pursue a claim.
It is common for people with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) to worry that their underlying condition may make it harder to pursue a claim, but this does not automatically prevent eligibility.
PBC is a progressive disease, yet the FDA’s findings showed that Ocaliva caused harm beyond what would normally be expected from the natural course of the illness.
Even patients without cirrhosis (who typically have a more stable disease trajectory) experienced severe and unexpected liver deterioration while taking the drug.
Attorneys look closely at medical records to determine whether the timing and severity of the injury align with known risks of Ocaliva rather than typical PBC progression.
A sudden drop in liver function, new complications shortly after starting the medication, or injuries that are inconsistent with a patient’s prior health history can all point toward drug-related harm.
Expert medical review can help distinguish what portion of the injury was likely caused by the medication.
Even if PBC contributed to the overall condition, Ocaliva may still be considered a substantial factor in the worsening injury.
For many patients, the combination of underlying disease and drug-related harm strengthens (not weakens) the basis for a legal claim.
Owner & Attorney - TorHoerman Law
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?