Our firm is about people. That is our motto and that will always be our reality.
We do our best to get to know our clients, understand their situations, and get them the compensation they deserve.
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Without our team, we would’nt be able to provide our clients with anything close to the level of service they receive when they work with us.
The TorHoerman Law Team commits to the sincere belief that those injured by the misconduct of others, especially large corporate profit mongers, deserve justice for their injuries.
Our team is what has made TorHoerman Law a very special place since 2009.
The Smiths Medical ventilator lawsuit investigation centers on allegations that manufacturing defects and inadequate quality controls in the paraPAC Plus P300 and P310 ventilators led to serious injuries and fatalities, placing patients at risk due to device malfunctions that disrupted life-sustaining respiratory support.
Our lawyers are actively investigating potential personal injury or product liability claims related to these devices.
On this page, we’ll discuss the potential Smiths Medical ventilator lawsuit, the Smiths Medical recall for certain ventilator devices, how these devices work and where they are used, and much more.
Smiths Medical, now part of ICU Medical, has recently issued several recalls for its ventilators due to safety concerns.
These recalls have been classified as Class I by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), indicating a potential for serious injury or death.
The primary models involved in these recalls are the paraPAC Plus P300 and P310 ventilators.
These devices are designed to provide respiratory support to patients in various healthcare settings.
The recall concerning the loose patient outlet connector has been associated with reports of injuries and at least one death.
The other recalls, including those related to the tidal volume knob movement and continuous positive gas flow malfunction, have not reported any injuries or deaths.
Smiths Medical has faced multiple quality issues in recent years.
In 2021, the company received a warning letter from the FDA, and in 2024 alone, there have been seven Class I recalls involving the company.
Lawyers are investigating claims from individuals who have been injured and also from family members of those who have tragically passed away potentially due to the defects in these devices.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries related to the recalled Smiths Medical Ventilators, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit and seek compensation.
Our lawyers are actively investigating the Smiths Medical recall and are speaking to potential clients about their situations.
Reach out to us today for a free consultation.
The Smiths Medical ventilator recall relates to serious risks associated with device malfunctions in critical care settings.
Multiple recalls have been issued for the paraPAC Plus P300 and P310 ventilators, primarily due to design and manufacturing defects.
Smiths Medical’s gas-powered portable ventilators, used to deliver oxygen therapy and ventilation at accident scenes and during transport, have been linked to significant malfunctions.
These include a loose or detached patient outlet connector, inadvertent movement of the tidal volume knob, and issues with continuous positive gas flow, all of which compromise the device’s ability to deliver proper respiratory support.
These devices are critical in emergency settings, including use in airplanes and helicopters, providing continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and ventilatory support during CPR resuscitation.
However, the FDA reported that the ventilators may intermittently provide continuous positive gas flow instead of cycling like a human breath when set to “ventilate” mode.

This malfunction can result in inadequate oxygen delivery (hypoventilation), airway obstruction, and potentially life-threatening consequences, including serious injury or death.
The FDA has classified these recalls as Class I, indicating the highest level of risk, with the potential for severe injury or death.
Despite the recall, the company advised continued use of the devices with heightened monitoring, urging users to check patient oxygenation and carbon dioxide levels and have backup ventilation equipment available.
If continuous flow issues arise, the ventilators should be removed from clinical use and set aside for repair.
The recalls of Smiths Medical paraPAC Plus P300 and P310 ventilators stem from multiple serious defects, each posing unique risks to patient safety.
These malfunctions undermine the device’s ability to provide effective ventilation, exposing patients to potential injury or death.
Healthcare providers are urged to review the recall notices thoroughly and adhere to the manufacturer’s guidance for repairs or replacements.
Vigilant monitoring of patients using these devices is critical to prevent further adverse events.
Smiths Medical ventilators, including the paraPAC Plus P300 and P310 models, play a critical role in providing respiratory support to patients who are unable to breathe adequately on their own.
These devices are essential in emergency medical services, intensive care units, and other healthcare settings, where precise and reliable ventilation is crucial for patient survival.

These medical devices are often used in:
The paraPAC Plus ventilators are designed to deliver precise and customizable respiratory support to patients in need.
These devices are portable and adaptable, making them suitable for use in emergency, hospital, and transport settings.
Their functionality ensures proper oxygenation and ventilation, mimicking natural breathing patterns.
These features make paraPAC Plus ventilators extremely useful in critical care, especially when immediate, reliable respiratory support is required.
Injuries or deaths related to Smiths Medical ventilator defects occur when critical malfunctions prevent the device from delivering adequate respiratory support.
A loose or detached patient outlet connector can interrupt ventilation entirely, leading to hypoxia or respiratory failure if not addressed immediately.
Malfunctioning tidal volume knobs may alter airflow settings, causing patients to receive insufficient or excessive ventilation, potentially resulting in respiratory distress or lung damage.
Continuous positive gas flow issues can create imbalances in airway pressure, increasing the risk of hyperinflation or tissue injury.

These defects often require urgent intervention by healthcare providers, who may not have immediate backup equipment available.
Delays in identifying or resolving these issues can exacerbate complications, especially for critically ill or ventilator-dependent patients.
Such failures, particularly in emergency or transport scenarios, heighten the risk of fatal outcomes.
The recall of Smiths Medical paraPAC Plus P300 and P310 ventilators has raised significant concerns about patient safety and device reliability.
These ventilators, used in critical care and emergency settings, have been linked to serious malfunctions, including ventilation interruptions and improper airflow delivery.
Reports of injuries and death have prompted lawyers to investigate potential claims on behalf of affected patients and their families.
Legal investigations aim to determine whether manufacturing defects, inadequate quality controls, or failure to warn contributed to the harm caused by these devices.

Patients who suffered injuries or lost loved ones due to these defects may have legal options to pursue compensation for medical expenses, emotional distress, and other damages.
Contact us for a free consultation.
Smiths Medical has issued recalls for specific ventilator models due to safety concerns.
The primary devices affected are the paraPAC Plus P300 and P310 ventilators.
These recalls address issues such as loose or detached patient outlet connectors, unintended movement of the tidal volume knob, and continuous positive gas flow malfunctions.
Healthcare providers using these models should consult the manufacturer’s recall notices for detailed information and guidance.
Recalled devices:
Smiths Medical ventilators, including the recalled paraPAC Plus P300 and P310 models, are used in various critical care and emergency settings.
These devices provide essential respiratory support in environments where patients are unable to breathe or gather enough oxygen independently.
Their portability and versatility make them suitable for use during transport, in hospitals, and by emergency medical services (EMS).
The ventilators are also commonly employed in operating rooms and intensive care units (ICUs) to support patients with respiratory distress or undergoing surgery.
Settings where ventilator devices are used:
Individuals who were injured by the malfunction of a recalled Smiths Medical ventilator may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
This includes patients who experienced complications such as respiratory failure, hypoxia, or lung damage due to the device’s defects.
Families of patients who suffered fatal outcomes linked to these malfunctions may also pursue wrongful death claims.
Additionally, healthcare providers who faced challenges or liabilities because of the defective ventilators may have grounds for legal action.
An experienced lawyer can help determine eligibility and explain the legal process for those impacted by the recall.
It is critical to act quickly, as legal claims may be subject to specific statutes of limitations.
Owner & Attorney - TorHoerman Law
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?