Our firm is about people. That is our motto and that will always be our reality.
We do our best to get to know our clients, understand their situations, and get them the compensation they deserve.
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Without our team, we would’nt be able to provide our clients with anything close to the level of service they receive when they work with us.
The TorHoerman Law Team commits to the sincere belief that those injured by the misconduct of others, especially large corporate profit mongers, deserve justice for their injuries.
Our team is what has made TorHoerman Law a very special place since 2009.
Surgical staplers are used in several routine medical procedures, but what happens when a routine surgery becomes a matter of life and death? This is exactly what has happened to thousands of patients who have suffered potentially fatal injuries as a result of surgical stapler defects.
Many of these injuries went unreported, or so it would appear, as the records of reported surgical stapler injuries and deaths were housed in a secret FDA database, referred to as “alternative summary reporting”.
The “alternative summary reporting” database skewed the total number of known surgical stapler injuries and deaths, and substantially limited public awareness of the serious health risks associated with surgical staplers.
In a damaging report released by Kaiser Health News, it was found that the FDA had created and expanded a “vast and hidden repository of reports on device-related injuries and malfunctions.” Included in that hidden database are reports of injuries and deaths caused by surgical staplers.
Now, as public knowledge of this issue grows, lawsuits are being filed on behalf of patients who suffered surgical stapler injuries, unaware of the potential risks associated with these commonly-used devices.
If you or a loved one suffered an injury or passed away from a defective Surgical Stapler, you may be eligible to file a Surgical Stapler Lawsuit and secure financial compensation for what’s happened.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation. You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Surgical Stapler Lawsuit instantly.
Our law firm is committed to helping those harmed at no fault of their own secure compensation. We aren’t afraid to take on large companies for their negligence.
Reach out to us for more information. We’re here to help you.
TorHoerman Law is no longer accepting clients for this litigation.
Surgical staplers by compressing the tissue on either side of a wound, and then connecting it with spaced-out rows of B-shaped staples. Some types can also be used to remove excess tissues from around the wound, ensuring that it heals cleanly.
Used in “gastrointestinal, gynecologic, thoracic, and many other surgeries”, surgical staplers are used both externally and internally. Removable skin staples, for external use, “close wounds under high tension, including wounds on the scalp or the trunk of the body.” Internally, surgical staples “deliver compatible staples to internal tissues during surgery.”
Staplers are easier and more convenient than sutures, but they do carry a bevy of additional risks. If a stapler misfires or fails to properly seal a wound, it can lead to serious issues like infections and allergic reactions.
These complications can cause lifelong health issues for patients, which may be completely unrelated to the original procedure they were undergoing. In some cases, patients injured by surgical stapler malfunctions require costly treatment and/or long-term care.
Patients who undergo a procedure that requires surgical staplers are at risk for many types of serious injuries and complications, including:
If your health has been compromised because of an injury caused by a surgical stapler or staples, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit. There are several different factors that cause surgical stapler injuries to occur.
While we have only recently begun to understand the full scope of the problem, complications caused by surgical staples have been affecting patients for years. Most commonly, these injuries and deaths are caused by:
Many surgical stapler lawsuits claim that patient injuries or deaths were the result of errors made by the surgeon. However, there are also many reports of defective surgical staplers misfiring, provoking questions of fault.
There have been several major settlements awarded to patients for injuries caused by defective surgical staplers, and several high-profile examples of manufacturers being forced to recall these devices.
Ethicon, a major manufacturer of medical devices and a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, has been involved in several notable lawsuits related to defective surgical staplers that caused injuries and deaths.
In 2012, a Pennsylvania family alleged the death of their loved one was caused by a defective stomach stapler during gastric bypass surgery. The Ethicon stapler, according to the lawsuit, failed to properly seal the surgical area which then allowed the stomach contents to spill into the intestines. A jury awarded the family $5 million in damages.
In May 2013, the following surgical staplers, like the one used in the botched gastric bypass surgery, were recalled due to the high adverse events reported:
Another surgical stapler incident occurred in January 2012, when Florence Kuhlmann alleged that an Ethicon proximate surgical stapler misfired and sealed her anal cavity, causing two weeks of hospital care and the permanent use of a colostomy bag.
A California jury awarded Kuhlmann $80 million, including nearly $70 million in punitive damages. As a result of Kuhlmann’s injury, Ethicon recalled over 157,000 of the hemorrhoid staplers used in her procedure.
Medtronic is an American medical device company that operates in over 150 countries around the world. Like Ethicon, they have been the subject of several lawsuits related to defective surgical staplers.
In 2019, Medtronic was sued by three different people who claimed that they were injured by defective staplers, and that company knowingly hid the risk when selling these devices. As a result, Medtronic issued a selective recall of its ENDO GIA surgical staplers in June 2019.
Ryan Strange of Illinois named healthcare products manufacturer Covidien in a lawsuit that claimed his wife’s death was caused by a defective surgical stapler. Strange’s wife April bled to death in 2013 after a procedure to remove a noncancerous mass from her liver went wrong.
The lawsuit alleged that the Covidien Stapler in question failed to properly seal one of April Strange’s blood vessels, causing severe blood loss that eventually resulted in cardiac arrest. In 2017, Ryan Strange was awarded a $5.5 million settlement for the wrongful death of his wife.
In response to the Kaiser Health News report about their use of the “alternative summary reporting” database, the FDA announced a plan to review the safety of surgical staplers on March 8, 2019.
Following this review, the FDA proposed the reclassification of certain surgical staplers from low-risk to moderate-risk, making the approval process for these devices more stringent. The agency also issued new labeling recommendations for surgical staplers that address proper use and safety risks. Since then, several updates to these recommendations have been announced.
In June 2019, the FDA sent a letter to doctors and other healthcare providers discussing the danger of surgical staplers, and the high number of incidents associated with their use, which was later updated to include additional announcements and recommendations.
The surgical stapler litigation is ongoing, and lawyers across the country are still accepting cases. The issues with certain types of surgical staplers are varying: misfiring, risk of infection, allergic reaction, and more. If you or a loved one suffered an injury due to a malfunctioning surgical stapler, you may be eligible for a lawsuit.
If you’ve sustained an injury as a result of a defective surgical stapler, hiring a personal injury lawyer is an extremely important step in the process of obtaining justice. Ideally, you’ll want to find a lawyer who is experienced in both personal injury lawsuits and defective product lawsuits.
You should feel comfortable asking your potential surgical stapler lawyer as many questions as you deem necessary for making a final decision. These may include questions about their experience, fees, and familiarity with your type of case.
Your statute of limitations bars the amount of time you have to take legal action after first sustaining or discovering your injury, so do not hesitate to take the first initial step of hiring a surgical stapler lawyer.
If you have any questions about a surgical stapler lawsuit or the FDA secret database, contact TorHoerman Law at (888) 508 6752. An experienced surgical stapler injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law is available to discuss your potential surgical stapler lawsuit, with no obligation necessary, and free of charge.
At TorHoerman Law, we work on a contingency fee basis for all surgical stapler lawsuit clients — so, we don’t get paid unless our clients do.
Common causes of surgical stapler injuries are:
Surgical staplers and staples have been linked to a number of health risks such as infection or allergic reaction when they are defective.
Surgical staples can be used both internally and externally on patients.
Owner & Attorney - TorHoerman Law
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?