Our firm is about people. That is our motto and that will always be our reality.
We do our best to get to know our clients, understand their situations, and get them the compensation they deserve.
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Without our team, we would’nt be able to provide our clients with anything close to the level of service they receive when they work with us.
The TorHoerman Law Team commits to the sincere belief that those injured by the misconduct of others, especially large corporate profit mongers, deserve justice for their injuries.
Our team is what has made TorHoerman Law a very special place since 2009.
Bard PowerPort catheter fracture lawsuit claims focus on defects in the catheter design may lead to structural failure during use.
The Bard PowerPort litigation includes claims of design defects leading to complications such as fractures and infections.
TorHoerman Law is evaluating reported injuries, device performance, and supporting medical evidence tied to Bard PowerPort implants.
Bard PowerPort catheter fracture lawsuit claims focus on allegations that the Bard PowerPort catheter device developed cracks, weakened over time, or fractured after implantation.
The device is used to provide long-term venous access for chemotherapy, infusions, and other repeated treatments.
Plaintiffs allege that catheter fracture can lead to migration, embolization, thrombosis, infection, and other serious internal complications.
A fractured catheter may also require urgent removal procedures, vascular intervention, or additional surgery to prevent further harm.
Federal lawsuits involving Bard implanted port catheter products are pending in MDL No. 3081 in the District of Arizona, where coordinated pretrial proceedings continue.
Future Bard PowerPort trial dates may provide insight into how juries respond to fracture allegations and the medical evidence tied to those claims.
Bard denies the defect allegations and maintains that PowerPort devices are FDA-cleared and that the complications raised in litigation are known risks identified in the instructions for use.
TorHoerman Law is reviewing fracture-related claims and offers a free case evaluation for patients who suffered complications after receiving a Bard PowerPort.
If you or a loved one experienced a Bard PowerPort fracture and later required additional treatment, surgery, or suffered related complications, you may be eligible to pursue a Bard PowerPort lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation.
Use the chat feature on this page to find out if you qualify for the Bard PowerPort lawsuit instantly.
The Bard PowerPort is an implantable vascular access device used for repeated intravenous treatment.
It allows medications, fluids, and blood products to be delivered directly into a central vein without repeated needle insertion into peripheral veins.

The system includes a small reservoir placed under the skin and a catheter that extends into a major blood vessel.
This design allows long-term access, but material degradation and fracture over time remain core problem with Bard PowerPort devices.
The Bard PowerPort is used by patients who require ongoing treatment over an extended period and need reliable access to the bloodstream.
This includes individuals receiving repeated infusions, long-term medications, or treatments that cannot be delivered through standard short-term IV lines.
These patients often rely on the device throughout the course of treatment, with the injection port remaining implanted for months.
During this time, the catheter stays in place inside the body while normal daily activities continue.

Regular use of the device means it is accessed frequently for treatment, including medication delivery and routine flushing.
Each use places pressure inside the catheter, while everyday movement affects how it sits and bends within the body.
The combination of long-term implantation, repeated use, and ongoing movement affects how the catheter performs over time, particularly in patients who depend on the device for continuous treatment.
The Bard PowerPort is used by patients who need repeated or long-term intravenous access during treatment.
The device is implanted under the skin and connected to a large vein, which allows healthcare providers to deliver medication, fluids, nutrition, or contrast without repeated needle sticks.
This type of access is often used when treatment will continue for weeks or months.
The device may also be used when certain medications or infusions are better delivered through central venous access.

Patients who may use a Bard PowerPort include:
Because the device remains implanted during ongoing treatment, it is often used in settings where stable, repeated vascular access is necessary.
The Bard PowerPort and similar implantable port systems are used in long-term treatment, but reports over time have linked these devices to complications affecting both device function and patient safety.
These concerns often involve how the device performs under repeated use inside the body over extended periods.
In that context, questions have been raised about how the device was evaluated before use.
The Bard PowerPort device was cleared through the FDA’s 510(k) process, which does not require the same level of clinical testing as premarket approval.
This has been referenced in discussions about long-term performance and risk.
Over time, reports of device-related injuries have emerged, including complications that can interfere with treatment delivery, require additional procedures, or lead to more serious health outcomes.

Some of the known medical complications linked to the Bard PowerPort device include those identified when patients report Bard PowerPort injuries and adverse health effects:
A catheter fracture is a medical complication that occurs when the catheter, a thin tube that connects the implanted port to a large vein, breaks or becomes damaged.

When this fracture happens, it can have severe consequences for the patient’s health and well-being.
Identifying a catheter fracture can be challenging, as the symptoms may not always be immediately apparent.
A good rule of thumb is to seek out your medical provider right away if you feel any pain near the catheter site.

Here are some of the most common signs of catheter fracture:
Catheter fractures on Bard PowerPort devices have been a cause for concern and a central issue in many lawsuits.
The fractures are believed to occur due to design or manufacturing defects in the PowerPort.

Some of the factors contributing to these fractures may include:
Beyond the immediate risk of a catheter fracture, there are additional complications that can arise as a result of this problem.

These complications can have serious consequences for patients and may include:
The Bard PowerPort MDL is the federal proceeding that coordinates lawsuits alleging injuries caused by Bard implanted port catheter products, including the Bard port catheter and related PowerPort devices.
The United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation created the Bard PowerPort multidistrict litigation in 2023 and transferred the cases to the District Court for the District of Arizona.
The MDL is pending in the United States District Court before Judge David G. Campbell, often referenced in filings as Judge Campbell.
Several Bard PowerPort lawsuits have since been centralized there for coordinated pretrial work, including discovery, motion practice, and recurring case-management orders.
The court has continued to hold a case management conference schedule and related status conference proceedings as the litigation moves forward.
Plaintiffs have brought Bard PowerPort lawsuit allegations involving catheter fracture, migration, thrombosis, infection, and other complications allegedly linked to defective design or inadequate warnings.

Bard, now part of Becton, Dickinson and Company, denies those allegations and maintains that the device is FDA-cleared and that the risks identified in litigation are known risks disclosed in the instructions for use.
The court is also moving toward trial testing, with Bard PowerPort bellwether trials scheduled as part of the process leading up to the first bellwether trial.
Bard PowerPort lawsuit allegations center on claims that the catheter used in the Bard PowerPort device may fracture during use, leading to migration, vascular injury, and other serious complications.
Bard PowerPort lawsuits allege that Bard Access Systems Inc. and Becton Dickinson and Company failed to adequately warn patients and healthcare providers about these risks associated with the device.
These allegations are now being examined across Bard PowerPort cases in federal court, forming the basis for ongoing proceedings, including evidence review, discovery process, trial preparation, and upcoming developments addressed in the sections that follow.
Despite these allegations, the Bard PowerPort remains approved by the FDA and has not been recalled for fracture risks, though a limited recall occurred in 2020 for an unrelated issue.

These filings describe recurring issues raised across Bard PowerPort cases:
The outcomes of bellwether trials may influence potential bard powerport lawsuit settlements in the Bard PowerPort litigation.
Cases involving vascular damage directly resulting from at least one occurrence event could have a settlement payout value ranging from $175,000 to $350,000.
Cases of thrombosis or pulmonary embolism in bard powerPort thrombosis lawsuits may have a settlement value of around $100,000 to $250,000.

Infection cases related to Bard PowerPort devices will likely have a settlement value range of $30,000 to $100,000.
The average bard powerport lawsuit settlement payout for Bard PowerPort lawsuits is projected to be between $150,000 to $300,000, with some claims exceeding $1 million.
Implantable port catheter devices can be vital pieces of medical equipment that provide access to a patient’s bloodstream, but if the port catheter device is designed with materials that make the device prone to failure, serious injuries can occur.
Catheter port material used on the Bard PowerPort device may potentially present an increased risk of severe complications and serious injuries to patients.
Lawsuits claim that the Bard Power Port device is prone to catheter migration, fracture, and other injuries.

If you or a loved one has suffered injuries or related Bard PowerPort complications, you may be eligible to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation with our Bard PowerPort attorneys.
Use the chatbot on this page to find out if you’re eligible to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit instantly.
Lawyers who specialize in product liability lawsuits can help victims seek compensation they are rightfully owed.
Bard PowerPort lawyers can help victims gather evidence related to their serious injuries, and assess damages to be included in their Bard PowerPort lawsuit claim.
One of the first steps in pursuing a Bard PowerPort lawsuit is to consult with an experienced personal injury attorney specializing in medical device litigation.
Attorneys who specialize in product liability lawsuits for medical device defects have the knowledge and expertise necessary to assess the merits of your case and guide you through the legal process.

At TorHoerman Law, we have an expert team of legal representatives with extensive experience helping patients seek their rightful compensation.
We are currently accepting cases related to Bard Power Port, and we are prepared to represent you.
To build a strong case, your attorney will work with you to gather essential evidence.
This evidence will help establish the link between your injuries and the Bard PowerPort device, demonstrating liability on the part of the manufacturer.
This part of the process can be started on your own, but an experienced Bard PowerPort lawyer can help you with this essential step.

Possible evidence in a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit may include:
Damages refer to the total losses incurred, economic and non-economic, as a result of using a defective Power Port catheter device and subsequent injuries.
Your attorney will help you assess and calculate damages.
The damages you can recover in a Bard PowerPort lawsuit may vary based on the specific circumstances of your case.

Potential damages in Bard PowerPort Lawsuits may include:
At TorHoerman Law, we are dedicated to helping individuals and families who are suffering from Bard PowerPort device complications.
If you or a loved one has experienced complications or injuries from a Bard PowerPort device, don’t hesitate to contact us for a free consultation.
We will review your case, answer your questions, and help you file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit to seek financial compensation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Bard PowerPort Lawsuit instantly.

Our experienced attorneys have a proven track record of success in medical device litigation, and we understand the physical, emotional, and financial toll these injuries can take on victims and their loved ones.
We are committed to fighting for the rights of those affected and holding manufacturers accountable for the harm their products have caused.
For the most recent PowerPort lawsuit updates, visit this page.
Currently, the average Bard PowerPort settlement amount has not been declared.
Potential compensation can vary depending on the facts of each case, including the type of injury, medical treatment required, and documented losses.
Attorneys estimate that potential Bard PowerPort settlement amounts could range between $10,000 and over $250,000, depending on individual damages and the direction of the litigation.
These figures are not fixed and do not represent guaranteed outcomes.
These projections are based on prior product liability claims and may change as the Bard PowerPort litigation develops, including outcomes from bellwether trials and negotiated resolutions.
A port catheter lawsuit settlement may depend on factors such as the severity of complications, costs of medical care, lost income, and the extent of long-term impact.
TorHoerman Law reviews Bard PowerPort claims and may provide a case-specific assessment based on medical records, reported injuries, and supporting evidence.
Complications linked to the Bard PowerPort include catheter migration, catheter fracture, infections at the implantation site, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and other potential injuries such as pain, resistance during flushing, and blood clots.
If you or a loved one have experienced complications or injuries due to the Bard PowerPort device, it’s recommended to consult with experienced Bard PowerPort Injury Lawyers to evaluate your eligibility and guide you through the lawsuit process.
You can use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Bard PowerPort Lawsuit and to get in touch with our Bard PowerPort Lawyers today.
Essential evidence can include medical bills, treatment information, medical records, employment records, personal accounts of the injury (written or video), photos/videos of injury progression, and witness testimonies.
Connecting with an experienced Bard PowerPort lawyer can help streamline the evidence-gathering process.
Damages can encompass medical expenses, therapy costs, lost wages, permanent disability, pain and suffering, emotional damages, and other compensatory and punitive damages.
The specific damages one can seek vary based on individual case circumstances.
Lawyers experienced in product liability lawsuits can help you assess and calculate relevant damages in your Bard PowerPort Lawsuit.
No.
Bard PowerPort cases are not being handled as a class action. Instead, they are part of multidistrict litigation, or MDL, which is a federal process used to group similar lawsuits together in one court for coordinated pretrial proceedings.
In an MDL, each plaintiff keeps an individual case with their own injuries, medical history, and damages, rather than being part of a single combined claim.
A class action works differently.
In a class action, one case represents a larger group of people with similar claims, and any outcome applies to the entire class.
In contrast, the Bard PowerPort MDL allows cases to be managed together for efficiency during discovery and pretrial rulings, while still preserving each person’s right to pursue an individual result
There has not been a broad recall of Bard PowerPort devices related to the fracture and failure issues at the center of current lawsuits.
However, the FDA did issue a limited Class II recall of certain PowerPort models in 2019–2020 due to a catheter component issue that could prolong surgery, not for fracture or migration risks.
Importantly, no recall has been issued for the catheter material breakdown, fracture, or thrombosis allegations driving most Bard PowerPort litigation.
Importantly, no recall has been issued for the catheter material breakdown, fracture, or thrombosis allegations driving most Bard PowerPort litigation.
Owner & Attorney - TorHoerman Law
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?