Our firm is about people. That is our motto and that will always be our reality.
We do our best to get to know our clients, understand their situations, and get them the compensation they deserve.
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Without our team, we would’nt be able to provide our clients with anything close to the level of service they receive when they work with us.
The TorHoerman Law Team commits to the sincere belief that those injured by the misconduct of others, especially large corporate profit mongers, deserve justice for their injuries.
Our team is what has made TorHoerman Law a very special place since 2009.
Use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation consultation.
Paragard IUD lawsuit settlement amounts may vary depending on the severity of Paragard complications, the medical care required, and the long-term impact on a person’s health.
Thousands of Paragard lawsuits filed against the manufacturers allege that the device can break during removal, leaving embedded fragments that cause serious internal injuries.
These claims describe a pattern consistent with defective medical devices, including uterine perforation, infertility, chronic pelvic pain, and the need for surgical intervention.
TorHoerman Law is currently reviewing claims and accepting cases for the Paragard lawsuit.
Thousands of women have filed claims in the Paragard IUD MDL, alleging serious complications caused by the device breaking during removal. When the Paragard IUD fractured, many patients required invasive surgeries, experienced long-term pain, or suffered reproductive damage.
These injuries have led to mounting litigation, with Paragard cases centralized in the Northern District of Georgia as part of the federal Paragard IUD multidistrict litigation.
While no official settlement has been announced yet, legal experts anticipate a potential global Paragard settlement in the coming months or years.
Based on trends from prior mass tort cases, estimated individual settlement amounts could range from $10,000 to over $400,000, depending on the severity of injuries, need for surgery, and lasting health consequences.
Cases involving permanent damage, infertility, or multiple surgical procedures may qualify for higher compensation tiers.
Less severe claims with short-term complications may fall into the lower end of the estimated range.
These projections are not guarantees, and individual results will vary depending on the specific facts of each case.
All estimations on this page are based on prior outcomes in other mass tort lawsuits and general legal analysis.
You should contact a lawyer directly to better understand how your injuries and experience may be evaluated within the Paragard litigation.
If you or a loved one has experienced Paragard IUD complications, you may be eligible to file a Paragard IUD Lawsuit and secure financial compensation.
Contact TorHoerman Law’s team of Paragard Lawyers for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to learn if you qualify for a Paragard Lawsuit.
The more severe the damages you suffered, the higher compensation you can expect.
In terms of a potential Paragard settlement, our lawyers estimate that each client may receive between $10,000 and $400,000.
These estimations are based on prior results in similar lawsuits and are not a guarantee of financial compensation for Paragard lawsuits.
For more detailed information about your Paragard lawsuit, reach out to our team for a free consultation.
There is no set amount for the settlement you might get after winning a Paragard Lawsuit.
This value will depend on the damages you’ve suffered, which your Paragard IUD lawyers will help you determine.

Tier 1 settlement projections for Paragard lawsuits are estimated to range from $200,000 to $400,000 or more, depending on the severity and permanence of the injury.
These top-tier cases often involve women who had a Paragard IUD implanted and experienced catastrophic IUD breakage during or after Paragard removal.
Victims in this category typically required multiple procedures or invasive surgical intervention to retrieve embedded fragments.
Some also developed long-term complications such as infertility or pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), resulting in lasting damage to their reproductive health.
The extent of the injury, the number of surgeries involved, and the documented impact on the victim’s life are key factors in placing a claim in Tier 1.
Tier 2 settlement projections in the Paragard IUD products liability litigation generally fall between $75,000 and $200,000, depending on the complications involved.
These cases typically include women who experienced Paragard IUD breakage during a routine or medically necessary Paragard IUD removal, but did not require multiple surgeries or suffer permanent reproductive harm.
Many Tier 2 claimants underwent at least one surgical procedure to retrieve fractured pieces of the copper IUD but had no long-term disability.
Claimants in this tier often reported moderate pain, emotional distress, or temporary disruptions to their health and fertility.
Though less severe than Tier 1, these cases still represent substantial injuries and remain a key part of the ongoing litigation.
Tier 3 settlement projections for Paragard claims typically range from $10,000 to $75,000, reflecting cases with less severe or short-term complications.
These claims may involve women who experienced discomfort or minor complications during Paragard removal but did not suffer long-lasting physical damage.
Many Paragard IUD lawsuits filed in this tier involve pain, anxiety, or minor injury without the need for surgical intervention.
Paragard attorneys still take these claims seriously, particularly when there is documented evidence of product failure or emotional distress.
Even without permanent harm, these cases highlight the broader safety concerns at the center of the litigation.
Women filing Paragard IUD lawsuits are seeking compensation for the physical, emotional, and financial harm caused by the device.
When an intrauterine device like Paragard breaks, it can lead to extensive medical treatment, lasting health complications, and serious personal disruption.
The Paragard copper IUD lawsuit focuses on injuries that often require surgery, impact reproductive health, or result in ongoing pain and psychological trauma.
Damages are calculated based on the severity of the injury, long-term consequences, and how the incident has affected the victim’s daily life and future well-being.
In many cases, both compensatory and punitive damages may be sought to reflect the full scope of harm.

Damages claimed in Paragard Lawsuits may include:
Paragard IUD removal lawsuits center on claims that the device is prone to breaking when women attempt to have a Paragard IUD removed.
Many Paragard IUD cases allege that the device’s plastic arms can fracture during removal, leaving fragments lodged in the uterus or surrounding tissue.
Plaintiffs argue that the manufacturers failed to warn physicians and patients about the risk of Paragard breakage, despite years of reported complications.
Paragard IUD device lawsuits describe cases in which fractured pieces migrate or become embedded, creating serious reproductive health risks.

Some individuals require hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, or even hysterectomy after a broken device cannot be retrieved safely.
Many of the Paragard IUD cases also describe long-term effects, including scarring, pain, and fertility problems.
The litigation continues to grow as more people report injuries and complications linked to the device’s structural weaknesses.
As these claims move forward, Paragard IUD removal lawsuits aim to hold the manufacturers accountable for harm associated with defective removal and breakage events.
Paragard Lawsuits are consolidated in multidistrict litigation (MDL).
Multidistrict litigation is a special federal legal procedure designed to speed the process of handling complex litigations by consolidating cases and addressing all pretrial procedures in one court.
When a large number of people who have all been affected by the same thing file individual lawsuits, the federal court system allows for the consolidation of these cases into an MDL to make them easier to manage.
MDLs take cases from multiple federal districts (each state has at least one district), and puts them into one district court.

This single district court, and one judge, then address all the discovery and pretrial procedures that apply to every case – cutting the costs and amount of resources needed, and keeping court rulings consistent with similar cases.
The Paragard MDL is also meant to prove the manufacturer and distributor’s liability for not including clear warnings about the device’s tendency to break.
There are more than 3,000 pending Paragard IUD lawsuits in the federal court of Georgia.
The plaintiffs are all suing Teva Pharmaceuticals and Cooper Surgical, the distributor of the product.
If the women succeed, they will receive compensation from the two companies.
No. There is not a Paragard class action lawsuit.
As mentioned above, the Paragard IUD Lawsuits are consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL).
MDL is different from class action lawsuits in that settlements are distributed to victims based on the facts of their individual case.
Class actions distribute settlement evenly between plaintiffs.

Many law firms refer to the consolidated Paragard Lawsuits incorrectly, using terms such as “Paragard Class Action Lawsuit”, “Paragard Class Action MDL”, or “Paragard Class Action Judge”.
These terms are incorrect.
If you’ve suffered an injury due to a broken Paragard IUD, your lawsuit will likely be consolidated into the Paragard MDL and your lawyer will help you advocate for the maximum compensation for your respective damages.
Paragard injuries typically occur when the Paragard intrauterine device fails during insertion, use, or removal.
One of the most reported complications involves the device breaking upon removal, which can leave fragments (often copper arms) lodged in the uterus or surrounding tissue.
In many cases, the Paragard IUD inserted properly and functioned as intended for a time, only to fracture later during routine extraction.
These breakages can cause sharp internal injuries, inflammation, and the need for surgical intervention.
Some patients have required multiple surgeries to retrieve all embedded parts and repair the damage.
These incidents have led to a wave of Paragard IUD defect lawsuits, in which plaintiffs allege that the device was defectively designed and that manufacturers failed to warn about the risk of breakage.
Injuries can range from mild pain to long-term reproductive harm, depending on the extent of the fragmentation and internal damage.
Many of these lawsuits are focused not only on the failure itself but also on the lack of sufficient guidance and warnings provided to both patients and physicians.

The most common concern about the Paragard IUD is its tendency to break during removal.
To take the birth control device away from the uterus, the OB/GYN needs to pull the removal cord outside the vaginal canal.
An IUD without any defects would simply fold and come out easily.
However, there are many reports of the Paragard IUD breaking instead.
If the IUD breaks inside the uterus, fragments can cause trauma and lacerations to the uterine cavity, cervix, and vagina.
Not only are these broken IUD pieces incredibly painful, but they can also trigger infections or even hemorrhage if the fragments perforate the uterine lining.
These pieces might also need to be surgically removed, endangering the woman’s life even further.
In some cases, the fragments can even leave the reproductive system and move to other parts of the body.
One of the rarer adverse events that can result from Paragard IUD failure is device migration.
This refers to the movement of the IUD several millimeters from its intended position.
This issue is a major concern since the Paragard IUD is not a hormonal contraceptive device.
As a means to prevent pregnancy, the IUD is simply made to block the egg and kill sperm coming in with the copper coil.
If the IUD moves, then sperm might pass through and fertilize the egg.
Since the egg cannot completely enter the uterus, it can implant in the fallopian tube and result in an ectopic pregnancy.
This type of pregnancy is life-threatening and results in so many other complications.
If a person suffered injuries because of a faulty Paragard IUD, then they may be eligible to file a Paragard IUD lawsuit.

Some of the qualifying injuries in Paragard IUD Lawsuits include:
To find out if you are qualified to file a Paragard IUD lawsuit, contact the experienced Paragard Attorneys at TorHoerman Law.
We’ll discuss your situation during a free, no-obligation consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Paragard Lawsuit instantly.
The chatbot is free, easy to use, and can determine your eligibility for the Paragard Lawsuit in less than two minutes.
With over a century in combined litigation experience and more than $4 billion awarded to clients in our litigations, our results and expertise speak for themselves.
TorHoerman Law focuses on helping those injured through no fault of their own.
We are dedicated to our practice of holding pharmaceutical companies and medical device manufacturers accountable for their greed-driven actions that put consumers at risk.
We offer free, zero-obligation case evaluations for all of our clients.

If you or a loved one suffered an injury due to a Paragard IUD break or migration, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit.
Contact us today for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Paragard Lawsuit instantly.
The Paragard IUD lawsuit is a large-scale products liability case involving claims that the Paragard intrauterine device is prone to breaking during removal, causing serious internal injuries.
Thousands of new Paragard IUD lawsuits have been filed and consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the Northern District of Georgia, overseen by Judge Leigh Martin May.
The Paragard lawsuits allege that the manufacturers failed to adequately warn patients and physicians about the risk of breakage and that the device suffers from design defects.
The first Paragard bellwether trial will help predict how juries may respond to key issues and evidence, and could influence future settlement discussions.
The litigation continues to grow as more women come forward with new Paragard lawsuits related to fractured devices and long-term complications.
You may be qualified to join the federal Paragard IUD lawsuits if you experienced complications after receiving the Paragard intrauterine device.
Women who suffered IUD injuries such as device breakage, embedded fragments, infection, or the need for surgical removal may be eligible to file a claim.
Qualification typically depends on the type of Paragard device used, the severity of the complications, and the medical treatment required to address those issues.
An attorney can review your medical records, treatment history, and timeline to determine if your case meets the criteria for litigation.
If you’ve suffered pain, reproductive harm, or other lasting effects tied to Paragard, legal action may be an option.
While no official settlements have been paid as of now, legal experts estimate that Paragard lawsuit settlements may range from $10,000 to over $400,000, depending on the severity of the injury and complications involved.
Current projections place Tier 1 Paragard lawsuit settlement amounts (involving permanent injury, multiple surgeries, or infertility) between $200,000 and $400,000 or more.
Tier 2 settlements, typically involving surgical removal and moderate long-term effects, may range from $75,000 to $200,000, while Tier 3 claims with less severe or temporary complications may fall between $10,000 and $75,000.
These estimates are based on patterns from similar mass tort cases and are subject to change as Paragard lawsuits pending in federal court continue to develop.
The exact value of each claim will depend on medical records, surgical intervention, and the individual’s physical and emotional impact.
Reach out to TorHoerman Law to understand your Paragard compensation claim, what you may be entitled to, and more.
Despite widespread concerns and reported complications, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not issued a Paragard recall for the device.
In February 2022, a Class I voluntary recall was initiated for a specific lot of Paragard T380A due to non‑sterility, but not because of breakage or structural issues; that recall has since been terminated by the FDA.
In response to growing reports of product failures (including thousands of complaints of the device fracturing during removal) the FDA conducted a safety review and updated Paragard’s warning label in 2024 to include copper wire breakage and perforation risks, but still did not mandate a recall.
As a result, although the Paragard recall for contamination has ended, the device remains approved and on the market.
Consumers should know that while no broad recall has occurred, the FDA continues to monitor and may take further action if safety concerns escalate.
Owner & Attorney - TorHoerman Law
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?