Our firm is about people. That is our motto and that will always be our reality.
We do our best to get to know our clients, understand their situations, and get them the compensation they deserve.
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Without our team, we would’nt be able to provide our clients with anything close to the level of service they receive when they work with us.
The TorHoerman Law Team commits to the sincere belief that those injured by the misconduct of others, especially large corporate profit mongers, deserve justice for their injuries.
Our team is what has made TorHoerman Law a very special place since 2009.
Facebook mental health lawsuit claims center on allegations that Meta Platforms knowingly designed Facebook and Instagram in ways that encourage addictive use and contribute to serious mental health harm, particularly among children, teens, and young adults.
These cases are consolidated with related claims against other platforms in the Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation pending in federal court in California.
TorHoerman Law is actively accepting cases from individuals and family members of individuals who have suffered mental health injuries linked to Facebook and Instagram use.
Facebook and Instagram’s parent company, Meta Platforms, has grown into one of the most influential technology corporations in the world, shaping how billions of people communicate, socialize, and consume information.
As its reach expanded, outside research and internal documents later revealed that Facebook and Instagram were designed to maximize engagement, even when those design choices increased risks to teens and young adults.
Investigations and whistleblower disclosures showed that Meta’s own research linked Instagram use to worsening body image issues, anxiety, depression, and other mental health consequences in younger users.
These findings helped fuel a wave of social media harm lawsuits alleging that Meta failed to protect vulnerable users during a worsening youth mental health crisis.
Plaintiffs in these cases describe serious injuries, including depression, eating disorders, self-harm, suicide attempts, and exposure to child sexual abuse material (CSAM) facilitated through platform features.
Social media lawsuits argue that these harms were not accidental but stemmed from product designs that rewarded prolonged use and behavioral dependency.
Facebook-related cases are now part of the nationwide social media addiction litigation, which consolidates personal injury claims against Meta and other tech companies and social media platforms into a single federal proceeding.
This coordinated litigation seeks to establish accountability, compensate victims, and evaluate whether social media companies placed profit over safety.
As the cases move forward, courts are examining whether Meta and similar companies can be held responsible for the predictable and preventable harm tied to their platform designs.
Facebook (Meta) is alleged to have engineered its algorithms to generate addictive content that later results in social media addiction, depression, and a slew of other mental health problems.
If you or a loved one used Facebook and/or Instagram and subsequently developed mental health problems, you may be eligible to file a Facebook Mental Health Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for legal action instantly.
The Facebook mental health lawsuit is part of a broader wave of social media addiction lawsuits alleging that Meta Platforms failed to responsibly design and manage Facebook and Instagram in a way that would protect children online.
These cases assert that Meta knew or should have known that its platforms posed serious risks to young people, particularly when used intensively during key developmental years.
According to allegations in the litigation, years of excessive social media consumption were linked to rising rates of depression, anxiety, eating disorders, and self-harm among teens and young adults, yet meaningful safeguards were not implemented.
At the center of these claims is Meta’s own internal research, which plaintiffs argue revealed troubling connections between platform use and negative mental health outcomes long before the public became aware of the issue.
Rather than redesigning products or taking steps to adequately warn users and parents, the social media addiction lawsuits allege that Facebook continued to expand features that encouraged longer use and deeper engagement.
These allegations form a key part of the Facebook and Instagram addiction lawsuits claim now pending in federal court.
Facebook-related cases are consolidated with similar claims against other platforms in the Social Media Addiction MDL, allowing courts to address shared factual and legal questions about platform design, corporate knowledge, and youth harm.

In addition to individual and family plaintiffs, school district lawsuits have also been filed, alleging that Facebook’s impact on student mental health has forced schools to absorb the costs of counseling, intervention programs, and crisis response.
Together, these claims seek accountability for how Facebook’s design choices may have contributed to widespread harm and a growing national mental health crisis.
Meta is alleged to have deliberately designed its platforms to be addictive.
The idea that Facebook and Instagram’s content impacts young users’ mental health is detailed in the internal documents leaked by Frances Haugen to the Wall Street Journal.
In these documents, it was revealed that in 2019, Meta (then called Facebook) conducted research into how its social media apps affected teen mental health.
The researchers found that Facebook and Instagram users suffered from various mental health problems ranging from depression to body image issues.
Facebook responded in multiple press releases that its platforms do the opposite and that it was unaware of the negative effects its platforms have on mental health.

However, according to the leaked documents, Meta knew of the mental health impacts of its social media platforms.
Instead of taking action, Meta continued to engineer its algorithms to keep users engaged — even if it came at the expense of their mental health.
One of the leaked documents from Haugen was a 2017 document that contained details on cyberbullying on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram (all Meta social media apps).
In these documents, there was indubitable evidence that these platforms have grown into a breeding ground for bullies and abusers who prey on teenage girls.
Once again, Meta knew of this.

However, despite the information the company had, it did little to regulate or monitor cyberbullying activity on all its platforms.
The lack of action potentially makes Meta liable for mental health condition teenage girls may develop from social media usage.
Meta knew of the negative mental health impacts of its platforms.
It reportedly continued to design its algorithms and platforms in a way that keeps users addicted.
By doing so, Meta allegedly made its users susceptible to anxiety disorders, appearance-based social comparison, depression, and other mental health issues.
Meta’s engineering of social media algorithms made it one of the world’s biggest social media companies in the world.

Unfortunately, the company achieved its status partly by taking advantage of the mental health crisis experienced by young users and their family members.
With this perspective, it’s easy to see that Meta’s rise to prominence can be labeled as unethical.
For this reason, the company is facing lawsuits for the harm it has potentially caused teens and young adult users.
The Facebook mental health lawsuit remains part of a much larger and active wave of litigation across the U.S. and beyond alleging that Meta’s platforms contributed to widespread harm to young people’s mental health.
Thousands of personal injury lawsuits claiming addiction, anxiety, depression, and other psychological harms tied to Facebook and Instagram are consolidated with similar claims against other tech companies in the Social Media Addiction MDL (Multidistrict Litigation) in federal court in California.
Plaintiffs continue to add cases to the docket, asserting that internal designs and algorithms encouraged excessive use without adequate warnings, despite internal research suggesting potential damage.
In parallel, dozens of state attorneys general have filed consumer protection laws actions against Meta alleging that Facebook and Instagram were engineered to addict teen users and compromise their well-being, with federal judges allowing a large portion of those claims to proceed.
These state actions, while separate from the MDL, underscore the growing political and legal scrutiny of platform design and youth harm.
Lawmakers have also taken notice: federal and state legislators are proposing and enacting laws to address how social media affects youth, including measures focusing on warning labels and platform responsibilities following Frances Haugen’s disclosures and whistleblower-driven attention to platform mental health impacts.

Recent developments include public challenges to Meta’s safety claims, such as criticism from the New Mexico Attorney General over Instagram’s teen “PG-13” rating system, which critics call misleading and insufficient for protecting children from harmful content and predators.
In a notable related case outside the primary MDL, parents of a 16-year-old who took his own life after an Instagram sextortion scam filed a wrongful death lawsuit alleging Meta’s lack of safety measures contributed to the tragedy, highlighting the ongoing legal and societal focus on platform safety and accountability.
There have not yet been any finalized settlements in the social media addiction litigation, including claims involving Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, or other platforms, because the cases are still in early stages of federal litigation.
Lawyers estimate that potential settlement amounts in these cases could range broadly from around $10,000 up to $200,000 or more per individual claim, depending on the facts and severity of harm suffered by the claimant.
These figures are projections based on injury severity, the presence of diagnosable mental health conditions, the potential for extreme outcomes like self-harm or suicide, and patterns seen in other mass-tort settlements.

These estimates are not guaranteed and do not reflect actual offers or awards, but rather a reasonable range given current litigation dynamics.
Final settlement values, if and when they occur, will depend on later case developments, evidence strength, and the outcomes of bellwether proceedings and negotiations within the Social Media Addiction MDL.
In 2021, Frances Haugen — a former Meta data engineer — leaked a series of internal documents to the Wall Street Journal.
These revealing documents exposed Facebook’s awareness of the detrimental impact its platforms had on users.
The Wall Street Journal made these documents public in an expose later called “The Facebook Files.”
“The Facebook Files” were a series of investigative reports that exposed the distressing link between social media use and increased rates of depression and anxiety among teenage girls.
Shockingly, Meta (then called Facebook) was well aware that its algorithms were designed to prioritize content that would keep users engaged even if it meant showcasing harmful material.
The gravity of the files raised serious concerns about the role of social media in today’s society.
By publicizing the leaked documents showing Meta’s involvement in the mental health crisis, it has prompted urgent calls for increased regulation of social media companies.
Also, more lawyers representing the victims of social media’s negative mental health effects began investigating potential legal action instantly due to the findings.

The key findings from the files include the following:
The files paint a concerning picture of Facebook’s corporate culture, revealing the company’s willingness to prioritize profits at the expense of user safety.
Young adults and teenagers (particularly teen girls) are the most susceptible to the harmful effects of social media usage.
Since the first lawsuits were filed against Facebook and other social media companies, more and more young social media users are reporting several mental health concerns and initiating legal action.
The potential emotional damage caused by Facebook, Instagram, Bytedance (TikTok), and other social media platforms takes many forms.

Contact us and find out if you are eligible to file a Facebook mental health lawsuit if your child or loved one has experienced any of the following mental health issues after chronic or excessive social media use:
One of the conditions that may result from chronic social media use is depression.
Depression from social media can be due to several things.
According to the Child Mind Institute, the resulting depression may be from lower-quality social connections.
When a social media user forms any sort of connection online, it may be of a “lower quality” than social bonds formed in real life.
As a result, the user becomes chronically unsatisfied, looking for more online connections and relationships to soothe the underlying feelings of sadness and boredom.
Depression can also result from interactions on social media, lack of interactions and a social circle, cyberbullying, and other negative ways young users may interact with social media.
Besides low-quality social bonds, another potential reason for depression is how it causes users to have unrealistic expectations — particularly with their bodies.
In 2021, Illinois State University uncovered the link between body image issues and social media use.
The development of body image issues (or body dysmorphia) results in several other potential mental health effects like eating disorders and depression.
Social media can trigger eating disorders like anorexia and bulimia.
Users who are exposed to certain social media trends, “thinspiration”, and other media that influences young users to restrict food intake can trigger a desire to engage in unhealthy eating behaviors.
Besides depression, chronic users of Facebook or Instagram may be at greater risk of developing low self-esteem.
Social media can make a user prone to negative social comparison.
This leads to depression, anxiety, eating disorders, and a whole host of other mental health problems.
The self-doubt generated from negative comparison also produces anxiety.
The curated content displayed on social media can create unrealistic standards and expectations for individuals, leading to anxiety about not measuring up or achieving enough.
This constant comparison can erode self-esteem and confidence.
This can trigger anxiety about someone’s own self-worth and life’s direction.
In a vicious cycle, users can turn to social media use to ease their anxiety.
When this occurs, users may become hooked on social media.
Social media keeps users occupied and distracted due to the novelty of the content shown.
When users log in to their social media accounts, they are bombarded by content.
The content leads to a constant stream of dopamine that keeps users coming back for more.
Several studies have identified the link between suicidal ideation and prolonged social media use.
Chronic social media use creates a range of negative mental health effects.
Together, these can overwhelm young users, causing them to develop thoughts of suicide.
If there’s one mental health impact parents should hold Facebook and other social media companies accountable for, it’s this.
The pain of losing a loved one to social media-induced suicide is tremendous.
Have you lost a child or loved one to suicide from social media use?
We are here for you.
Contact us now for a free case evaluation and find out how our team of attorneys and support staff can help guide you through the legal process.
Evidence is a central component of Facebook addiction lawsuits, as plaintiffs must show a clear connection between platform use and resulting harm.
These cases often rely on a combination of digital records and medical documentation to demonstrate how prolonged Facebook or Instagram use affected emotional well-being and physical health.
Attorneys frequently work with mental health professionals to evaluate diagnoses, treatment history, and behavioral changes linked to excessive use.
Evidence can also help establish when harmful patterns began, how long they persisted, and how they interfered with school, work, or family life.
Because many users were minors when their exposure began, early records and third-party observations can be especially important.
The goal is not just to show usage, but to demonstrate how Facebook’s design features contributed to addiction-like behavior and measurable injury.
Collecting and preserving this information early can significantly strengthen a claim within the broader litigation.

Evidence in Facebook mental health lawsuit claims may include:
When pursuing a Facebook mental health lawsuit, lawyers carefully assess the full scope of damages their clients have suffered due to social media addiction or the harmful effects of excessive social media usage.

These damages often fall into two categories: Economic and Non-economic.
Economic damages typically cover medical expenses, such as therapy, psychiatric care, and any treatments related to the mental health problems caused by Facebook use.
Lawyers gather medical records, billing statements, and estimates for ongoing treatments to ensure these costs are fully accounted for.
Non-economic damages, while harder to quantify, are just as critical.
These include the emotional distress, self-esteem issues, and social isolation that many plaintiffs experience due to negative aspects of social media usage.
Lawyers will rely on personal testimony, expert evaluations, and even family members’ accounts to demonstrate how mental health concerns like depressive symptoms, anxiety, and lasting emotional scars have impacted the individual’s psychological well-being and overall quality of life.
Lawyers will consider the broader societal impacts of social media platforms, especially on vulnerable populations such as young adults and teenagers.
The addictive nature of these platforms, which leads users to constantly check social media and engage in risky behaviors, contributes to significant declines in well-being and life satisfaction.
By thoroughly evaluating these factors, Facebook mental health lawyers work to seek compensation that addresses the full range of harm caused by social media companies.
For a long time, social media companies like Meta have evaded responsibility for the potential mental health harm associated with chronic use of their platforms.
We are here to represent victims and their families in lawsuits filed against Facebook (Meta) and other social media companies who may be responsible for your losses and other potential damages.
If you or a loved one excessively used social media and subsequently developed mental health effects, you may be eligible to file a claim and take legal action.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to take legal action instantly.

Our law firm is here to represent you and advocate for your best interests.
We recognize that the legal process can be overwhelming.
Contact our attorneys today and find out how our expertise can help you seek justice.
The Facebook mental health lawsuit involves claims that Meta Platforms designed Facebook and Instagram in ways that encouraged addictive use and contributed to serious mental health harm, particularly among children, teens, and young adults.
Plaintiffs allege that features meant to maximize engagement increased the risk of anxiety, depression, eating disorders, self-harm, and other emotional injuries.
These cases are part of a broader effort to hold social media companies accountable for the impact their products have had on users’ well-being.
The lawsuits are now coordinated in federal court as part of nationwide social media addiction litigation.
Together, they seek compensation for affected individuals and greater accountability for how these platforms were designed and promoted.
No, the primary litigation involving mental health harms from social media is not structured as a traditional class action.
Instead, these cases are consolidated into a multidistrict litigation (MDL) pending in the Northern District of California, which allows thousands of individual lawsuits to proceed together for pretrial purposes.
In an MDL, each plaintiff’s attorney files their own case, often using a short-form complaint, and retains individualized claims and potential compensation based on their specific injuries.
This differs from a class action, where all claimants are grouped into a single case and typically receive the same outcome.
The MDL structure benefits victims by streamlining discovery and court rulings while preserving each person’s right to present unique evidence and damages.
As a result, individuals harmed by social media addiction can pursue accountability without losing control over their individual claims.
The Social Media mental health lawsuit names several of the largest technology companies in the world as defendants, based on allegations that their platforms were designed in ways that contributed to addiction and mental health harm.
These cases are consolidated in a federal multidistrict litigation that addresses shared questions about product design, youth safety, and corporate knowledge.
The defendants include companies that operate the most widely used social media platforms among children, teens, and young adults.
Each is alleged to have played a role in promoting engagement-driven features that exposed users to increased risk of psychological harm.
Plaintiffs in Facebook mental health lawsuits are seeking compensation for the wide-ranging harms they allege resulted from prolonged and addictive use of Facebook and Instagram.
These damages are intended to reflect both the immediate and long-term impact on mental, emotional, physical, and financial well-being.
In many cases, attorneys argue that compensation should account for the lifelong consequences of harm suffered during critical developmental years.
The scope of damages varies depending on the severity of injury, duration of use, and supporting evidence.
Common types of damages sought include:
While the exact number of plaintiffs changes daily as new cases are filed, thousands of individuals and families have sued Meta and other social media platforms over alleged mental health harms linked to addictive app design.
Many of these lawsuits have been consolidated into the Social Media Addiction MDL in federal court, which now includes claims from users across the United States.
In addition to individual personal injury filings, school districts and public entities have brought related cases seeking compensation for increased counseling and support costs tied to student well-being.
Separate actions, including state attorney general consumer protection cases, name Meta alongside other defendants like TikTok and Snap in lawsuits focusing on youth mental health risks.
The pace of filings reflects growing public and legal scrutiny of how social platforms affect teen users and young adults.
While not all filed cases remain active as standalone suits (some are consolidated, dismissed, or merged into the MDL) the total plaintiff count is in the multi-thousands.
As awareness of social media’s potential impact on psychological and physical health continues, more individuals may come forward with claims.
Yes, it may be possible to sue Facebook for emotional distress if you or your child suffered significant mental health harm linked to prolonged or addictive platform use.
Lawsuits against Meta allege that Facebook and Instagram were designed in ways that encouraged compulsive behavior and contributed to anxiety, depression, self-harm, and other psychological injuries.
These claims are typically brought as part of the broader social media addiction litigation, where plaintiffs must show a connection between platform design and their emotional distress.
Evidence such as medical records, therapy notes, and usage data is often used to support these claims.
Each case is evaluated individually based on the severity of harm and the available proof.
TorHoerman Law can review your situation and determine whether an emotional distress claim may be viable under current law.
Social media companies often argue that they are protected from liability by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which generally shields online platforms from responsibility for content created by users.
In the current litigation, plaintiffs counter that these cases are not about third-party content, but about platform design choices that allegedly promote addiction and cause harm.
Courts are now closely examining whether claims based on defective design, failure to warn, and negligence fall outside the scope of that immunity.
Several rulings have allowed parts of these lawsuits to move forward despite those defenses.
This issue remains one of the central legal questions in the ongoing social media litigation.
Owner & Attorney - TorHoerman Law
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?