Our firm is about people. That is our motto and that will always be our reality.
We do our best to get to know our clients, understand their situations, and get them the compensation they deserve.
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Without our team, we would’nt be able to provide our clients with anything close to the level of service they receive when they work with us.
The TorHoerman Law Team commits to the sincere belief that those injured by the misconduct of others, especially large corporate profit mongers, deserve justice for their injuries.
Our team is what has made TorHoerman Law a very special place since 2009.
A Spinal Stimulator Lawsuit may be an option for individuals who suffered serious complications, device malfunctions, or worsening pain after receiving a spinal cord stimulator implant.
Patients who experienced issues such as failed implantation, nerve damage, infections, or the need for revision surgeries may qualify to take legal action.
On this page, we’ll discuss Who Qualifies for a Spinal Stimulator Lawsuit, how lawyers determine who qualifies to take legal action over a defective spinal cord stimulator device, the causes of spinal cord stimulator injury, and much more.
Spinal cord stimulators are medical devices implanted to help manage chronic pain, but for some patients, these devices have led to severe complications instead of relief.
If you suffered injuries or worsening pain after undergoing spinal cord stimulator surgery, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
Legal claims related to these devices generally fall into two categories: medical malpractice cases against healthcare providers and product liability lawsuits against device manufacturers.
A medical malpractice lawsuit may involve surgical errors or inadequate post-procedure monitoring, while product liability cases focus on defects in the device itself or insufficient warnings about potential risks.
Patients who have experienced infections, nerve damage, failed implantation, or the need for revision surgeries after a spinal cord stimulator procedure may qualify for legal action.
Lawsuits seek compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, lost wages, and other damages caused by device-related injuries.
Our law firm is actively reviewing cases related to these defective medical devices and assessing whether individuals qualify for a Spinal Stimulator Lawsuit.
If you believe your injuries were caused by negligence or a defective product, our legal team can help determine whether you qualify for a Spinal Stimulator Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation.
Use the chat feature on this page to find out if you qualify for a Spinal Stimulator Lawsuit instantly.
Patients suffering from chronic back and neck pain often turn to spinal cord stimulators as a last hope for relief when other treatments have failed.
Unfortunately, while these devices are meant to ease pain, they can instead cause severe injuries and complications, leaving patients in even worse condition than before.
From nerve damage to device malfunctions requiring additional surgeries, the risks can be life-altering and overwhelming.
Our law firm understands the toll this can take, and we are here to help you assess your legal options if your spinal cord stimulator has caused harm.
Spinal cord stimulators are designed to manage chronic pain, but for many patients, these devices have led to serious complications, worsening pain, and additional medical procedures.
If you have experienced injuries or required corrective surgeries after receiving a spinal cord stimulator, you may have grounds to pursue a Spinal Stimulator Lawsuit.
These legal claims seek to hold medical device manufacturers or healthcare providers accountable for injuries caused by device defects, surgical errors, or inadequate risk warnings.
Whether your injuries stem from a faulty device or negligence during implantation, legal action may help you recover compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.
Legal action against spinal cord stimulator manufacturers typically falls under product liability lawsuits, which allege that the devices were defectively designed, improperly manufactured, or lacked sufficient warnings about known risks.
Some cases, however, involve medical malpractice claims against surgeons or healthcare providers who may have improperly implanted the device, failed to monitor complications, or misled patients about their risks.
Determining who is liable in your case depends on the nature of your injuries and whether they were caused by a defective product or medical negligence.

If you have undergone revision surgeries, suffered new or worsening pain, or developed serious health complications due to a spinal cord stimulator, you may be entitled to compensation.
Lawsuits can help patients recover financial damages for medical costs, lost income, pain and suffering, and ongoing care needs.
Our law firm is actively investigating spinal cord stimulator cases and can evaluate your claim to determine if you qualify for legal action.
If you or a loved one has suffered severe complications after spinal cord stimulator implantation, contact us to discuss your legal rights and options.
Spinal cord stimulators are designed to relieve chronic pain by interrupting pain signals through electrical impulses sent to the spinal cord.
While some patients find relief, others suffer severe complications that leave them in worse condition than before implantation.
These injuries can occur due to surgical errors, device malfunctions, or unforeseen biological reactions, leading to long-term pain, loss of mobility, or serious neurological complications.
Patients with conditions such as spinal cord compression, degenerative disc disease, or spinal cord injury may be particularly vulnerable to complications if the stimulator is improperly placed or fails to function correctly.
Some injuries appear immediately after surgery, while others develop months or even years later, often due to scar tissue formation or device failure.
When a spinal cord stimulator does not work as intended, it can result in new or worsening pain, additional surgeries, or permanent nerve damage.

Common injuries and complications linked to spinal cord stimulation include:
These complications can lead to emergency medical intervention, revision surgeries, or long-term rehabilitation, significantly impacting a patient’s quality of life.
In many cases, these issues could have been prevented with better device testing, safer designs, or clearer warnings from manufacturers and medical providers.
If you or a loved one has suffered severe injuries from a spinal cord stimulator, legal action through a defective medical device lawsuit or medical malpractice claim may be an option to hold the responsible parties accountable and seek compensation for your losses.
Spinal cord stimulators are implanted medical devices designed to relieve pain by altering how pain signals are transmitted to the brain.
They are typically recommended for individuals suffering from severe back pain, leg pain, or chronic nerve-related conditions that have not responded to traditional treatments like physical therapy, pain medication, or spinal surgery.
The device works by delivering mild electrical pulses to the epidural space, the area surrounding the spinal cord, where pain signals travel.
By modulating nerve activity within the spinal canal, spinal cord stimulators help interrupt pain signals before they reach the brain, reducing the sensation of pain.
The implantation process begins with a spinal cord stimulator trial, where a temporary device is placed under the guidance of an orthopedic surgeon to assess whether spinal cord stimulation provides meaningful pain relief.

If the patient experiences significant improvement, a permanent stimulator is implanted in a follow-up procedure.
The device consists of thin leads placed near the spinal cord and a pulse generator, which is typically implanted under the skin in the abdomen or buttocks.
Patients control the stimulator’s intensity and frequency using a handheld remote, allowing them to adjust the electrical pulses based on their pain levels.
Modern spinal cord stimulators come in different forms, including burst stimulation devices, which send pulses in rapid bursts to more closely mimic natural nerve signaling.
Unlike traditional continuous stimulation models, burst devices aim to provide more effective pain relief while reducing tingling sensations often associated with earlier stimulator models.
Some devices are rechargeable, requiring periodic charging, while others have non-rechargeable batteries that may need replacement surgery over time.
While spinal cord stimulators do not cure the underlying cause of physical pain, they can help manage symptoms and reduce reliance on pain medication for many patients.
However, results vary, and some individuals may experience limited relief or complications that require device removal or revision surgery.
If a spinal cord stimulator fails to function correctly or leads to severe complications, legal action may be necessary to address the harm caused.
Patients who have experienced complications or worsening symptoms following spinal cord stimulator placement may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
These devices are intended to provide significant pain relief by altering how the nervous system processes pain signals, but for many, they have caused additional harm instead.
If your pain has worsened after implantation, or if you developed new health issues due to device malfunctions, surgical errors, or inadequate warnings, you may have a legal claim.
Lawsuits typically involve cases where patients have suffered infections, nerve damage, lead migration, or persistent pain that was not relieved as promised.
Some claims focus on medical malpractice, such as errors in device placement or failure to monitor post-surgical complications.
Others fall under product liability, targeting manufacturers for defective designs, electrical failures, or misleading marketing of spinal cord stimulators.
To qualify for a Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit, you must show that you suffered measurable harm due to the device or its implantation.

This may include additional surgeries, long-term disability, lost wages, or significant medical expenses related to device failure.
Patients who experienced numbness, paralysis, electric shocks, or severe infections after their implant may also have a strong case.
If you were promised significant pain relief but instead endured further injury, you have the right to explore legal options.
Our law firm is actively investigating cases where spinal cord stimulators have led to serious complications, and we can help determine whether you qualify to seek compensation.
Building a strong Spinal Stimulator Lawsuit requires comprehensive evidence to prove the extent of your injuries and establish liability.
Key documents and records can demonstrate whether the complications were caused by spinal cord stimulator placement errors, device malfunctions, or inadequate risk disclosures.
Collecting detailed evidence strengthens your case and helps determine whether you qualify for medical malpractice or product liability claims.

Essential Evidence for a Spinal Stimulator Lawsuit:
In a lawsuit, damages refer to the financial and personal losses a victim has suffered due to injury or negligence.
When a spinal cord stimulator fails to provide pain relief or causes severe pain, patients may be left with mounting medical bills, lost income, and long-term physical and emotional suffering.
Filing a Spinal Stimulator Lawsuit can help injured patients recover compensation for these damages, holding medical providers or device manufacturers accountable for the harm caused.

Types of Damages in a Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit:
If your spinal cord stimulator has failed to provide pain relief and instead caused severe pain or additional medical complications, you may be entitled to financial compensation.
Our law firm can evaluate your case and help you pursue the damages you deserve.
At TorHoerman Law, we are committed to helping individuals who have suffered severe complications from spinal cord stimulators seek justice and compensation.
Our legal team is actively investigating cases where these devices have failed to provide pain relief, caused severe pain, or led to additional surgeries and life-altering injuries.
Whether your claim involves medical malpractice, product liability, or both, we have the experience and resources to hold negligent manufacturers and healthcare providers accountable.

If you or a loved one has endured device malfunctions, nerve damage, infections, or worsening pain after spinal cord stimulator implantation, you may be eligible for a Spinal Stimulator Lawsuit.
Don’t wait to take action—contact TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation, and let us help you explore your legal options.
You may qualify to file a spinal cord stimulator lawsuit if you were implanted with one of these defective devices and suffered serious complications such as worsening pain, cardiac arrhythmia, or nerve damage.
Many plaintiffs in new spinal cord stimulator lawsuits report that device failures forced them to require corrective spinal surgery or live with ongoing physical and emotional suffering.
To pursue medical device litigation, you will need to show that the stimulator’s malfunction or design defect directly caused your injuries.
Keeping a detailed pain and symptom diary and collecting supporting documentation can strengthen your claim.
An attorney can help you gather evidence and evaluate whether the manufacturer or healthcare provider may be held liable for the physical pain endured by victims of faulty spinal implants.
You may qualify if you:
In some cases, spinal cord stimulators (SCS) can help alleviate chronic pain, but their effectiveness varies significantly by patient and condition.
Some studies have found that SCS offers superior pain relief compared with conventional medical management for certain patients with chronic back or leg pain, especially when non-surgical options have failed.
However, success often depends on the patient’s specific pain relief profile, including how long they’ve had pain, the cause (for example, prior surgery), and whether they respond well to a trial stimulation.
For conditions such as Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) or Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome (often after spine surgery), evidence shows benefit but also underscores that SCS may not maintain effective pain relief in all cases.
Some reviews point out that certain devices or approaches lose efficacy over time or that the relief is less than hoped, for example patients still needing medication or experiencing fluctuating benefit.
In short, while spinal cord stimulation can provide meaningful relief, it is not guaranteed, and it should be considered as one component of a broader pain management strategy rather than a standalone cure.
While spinal cord stimulators can help manage chronic back pain, they also carry serious risks that patients should understand.
Complications can occur when the device malfunctions while delivering electrical impulses near the spinal nerve root, or when physical components shift or break over time.
These issues can cause worsening chronic pain, inadequate pain relief, or even dangerous side effects like cardiac arrhythmia.
The physical and emotional toll of complications from a permanent spinal cord stimulator can be significant, often requiring additional pain management or revision surgery.
Potential risks include:
A medical malpractice case focuses on errors or negligence by healthcare providers, such as improper spinal cord stimulator placement, surgical mistakes, or failure to monitor post-surgical complications.
These claims argue that a doctor, surgeon, or hospital failed to meet the accepted standard of care, directly causing harm to the patient.
In contrast, a defective medical device lawsuit targets the manufacturer, distributor, or designer of the device itself, holding them accountable for product defects, inadequate testing, or failure to warn about known risks.
These lawsuits claim that the device was inherently unsafe or malfunctioned in a way that led to injury.
Medical malpractice attorneys handle cases involving physician errors, while defective medical device lawsuits typically fall under product liability law, requiring proof that the device was flawed or dangerous.
Several major companies are among the leading medical device manufacturers.
Spinal cord stimulation technology has advanced with systems that include an implantable pulse generator and leads designed to provide effective pain relief.
Many brands now offer rechargeable spinal cord stimulators alongside non-rechargeable options, with differences in programming, battery life, and MRI compatibility.
Innovation in spinal cord stimulator continues as companies refine closed-loop sensing, smaller IPGs, and broader indications.
Major manufacturers include:
If you have had a spinal cord stimulator developed by one of the companies above and suffered severe injuries, you may be eligible to file a spinal cord stimulator lawsuit and seek compensation.
Owner & Attorney - TorHoerman Law
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?