Our firm is about people. That is our motto and that will always be our reality.
We do our best to get to know our clients, understand their situations, and get them the compensation they deserve.
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Without our team, we would’nt be able to provide our clients with anything close to the level of service they receive when they work with us.
The TorHoerman Law Team commits to the sincere belief that those injured by the misconduct of others, especially large corporate profit mongers, deserve justice for their injuries.
Our team is what has made TorHoerman Law a very special place since 2009.
On this page, we’ll discuss Power Port Complications, common symptoms and risks associated with Bard PowerPort devices, what to do if you’ve been injured by a Bard implantable port catheter device, Bard PowerPort Lawsuits, and much more.
The Bard PowerPort is an implantable vascular access device used to provide repeated access to a patient’s bloodstream for infusions, blood draws, and other long-term treatment needs.
It is commonly used in patients who require ongoing intravenous therapy, including chemotherapy, antibiotics, and nutritional support.
The device is intended to reduce repeated needle sticks, but it remains in the body for extended periods and depends on the continued integrity of the catheter and port system.
Bard PowerPort lawsuits focus on allegations that some patients developed serious health complications after implantation, including infection, thrombosis, migration, fracture, and other device-related problems.
Plaintiffs allege that catheter failure can occur when the catheter material weakens, cracks, or breaks down over time.
Those allegations also involve claims that fractured or separated catheter fragments can move through the vascular system and create additional internal risks.
Disruption of normal blood flow is another central concern, particularly in cases involving clot formation, venous obstruction, or device migration.
These reported health complications are now at the center of a large number of Bard PowerPort cases filed by patients who allege that the device caused injuries requiring further medical treatment or surgical intervention.
If you or a loved one has been harmed by a defective Bard PowerPort device, you may be eligible to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation and to get in touch with our PowerPort Lawyers.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Bard PowerPort Lawsuit instantly.
Several Bard PowerPort Lawsuits have been filed by patients who’ve suffered serious injuries and complications from the fracture and migration of the implantable port catheter device.
Individuals who have suffered may be able to seek compensation.
The Bard PowerPort system is an implantable vascular access device designed to provide long-term access to the bloodstream for patients who require repeated infusions or blood draws.
Commonly referred to as a port catheter device, it consists of a small implanted port connected to a catheter that is inserted into a large vein by a trained medical professional.
The device allows for the delivery of medications, IV fluids, and nutritional support, and is frequently used in patients undergoing chemotherapy or other long-term treatments.
Bard Access Systems, Inc., now a subsidiary of Becton, Dickinson and Company, introduced the Bard PowerPort following FDA clearance in 2000 and marketed it as a safe and reliable option for long-term vascular access.
Lawsuits have been filed against Bard regarding PowerPort devices, alleging that the Chronoflex material is prone to fracturing, leading to serious injuries.
The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) established a Bard PowerPort MDL in August 2023 to streamline the resolution of lawsuits alleging similar claims against the manufacturer.
A growing number of Bard PowerPort claims allege that the device was not safe for all patients and that the manufacturer failed to adequately warn patients and healthcare providers about known risks.
According to these Bard port catheter lawsuits, defects in the catheter and port components may cause mechanical failure inside the body, exposing patients to serious harm.

Patients involved in pending lawsuits claim they experienced a range of serious health issues, including:
Infections are a significant risk associated with Bard PowerPort devices, potentially leading to sepsis if not treated promptly.
Blood clots, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT), can form around Bard PowerPort devices, causing symptoms like swelling and pain in the affected limb.
Pinch-off syndrome is a rare but serious complication of Bard PowerPort devices, occurring when the catheter is pinched between the clavicle and rib, blocking fluid flow.
As reports of these injuries increased, patients nationwide began filing Bard PowerPort lawsuits seeking accountability for the harm they suffered.
The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) has since consolidated these cases into a federal MDL to coordinate discovery, manage expert evidence, and promote consistent rulings across related claims.
If you or a loved one have been injured or suffered complications from using a Bard PowerPort device, you may be eligible to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit.
Contact us for a free case review.
Use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation to find out if you qualify to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit instantly.
Despite its widespread use, the Bard PowerPort catheter device has been linked to several serious medical complications.
Power ports are implantable venous access devices widely used for long-term treatments like chemotherapy.
These complications have prompted numerous lawsuits, alleging that design flaws and material weaknesses in the devices are responsible for the adverse health effects experienced by patients.
Complications associated with power ports reportedly occur in roughly 1 in 3 patients.
Complications of power ports can include infections, thrombosis, catheter fracturing, and migration, often resulting in the need for surgical removal.

One of the significant complications associated with Bard PowerPort devices is catheter migration.
Catheter migration occurs when the device moves from its initial placement.
Various factors may cause catheter migration, including surgical errors, improper device placement, and bodily movements.
In the case of the Bard PowerPort device, the polyurethane and barium sulfate mixture (called Chronoflex AL) used on the port catheter device is alleged to be defective.
With the Bard PowerPort device, the Chronoflex AL material may dislodge and allow the device to migrate.
Symptoms of PowerPort migration may include discomfort or pain at the port site, visible protrusion or displacement of the port, and difficulty flushing or accessing the port.
In severe cases, the catheter may migrate into other body parts, leading to severe complications.
Another risk associated with Bard PowerPort implants is catheter fracture.
The catheter is a delicate tube that connects the port to the bloodstream.
Catheter fractures in Bard PowerPort devices can occur due to mechanical stress, damage during insertion, or wear and tear over time.
Catheter fractures in Bard PowerPort devices can result in serious complications, including the release of plastic fragments into the bloodstream, which may puncture organs and rupture blood vessels.
Catheter fracture can lead to embolization of fragments that may travel to the heart or lungs.
In the case of the Bard PowerPort devices, catheter fracture and migration occurs due to the barium sulfate and polyurethane mixture used on the catheter body.
Symptoms of catheter fracture can include difficulty flushing the port, resistance when drawing blood, and even a sensation of the catheter breaking.
This complication can result in the need for surgical intervention to remove and replace the fractured portion(s).
Infections are another possible complication linked to the Bard PowerPort.
Infections are the most common complication associated with power ports, which may include port pocket infections or systemic bloodstream infections leading to sepsis.
Infections can arise from Bard PowerPort devices due to cracks and fissures in the catheter, which allow bacteria to enter the bloodstream.
Because these devices are in direct contact with the bloodstream, they provide a pathway for bacteria to enter the body.
Infections can occur at the port site or within the bloodstream, leading to a condition known as sepsis, which is a life-threatening medical emergency.
In the case of the Bard PowerPort, infections could arise due to the cracks and fissures present from the catheter fracturing.
Symptoms of an infection may include redness, swelling, tenderness, warmth, or discharge at the port site, fever, chills, and general malaise.
Prompt treatment is essential to prevent the infection from spreading and becoming more severe.
Blood clots are a risk associated with any device that comes into contact with the bloodstream, including Bard PowerPort catheters.
Thrombosis can occur due to blood clots forming around the catheter tip or in the vein, causing resistance during flushing or inability to draw blood.
The formation of blood clots, especially deep vein thrombosis (DVT), can occur around the port or within the blood vessels.
Symptoms of blood clots may include swelling, pain, or tenderness in the affected limb, as well as redness and warmth over the vein.
In severe cases, victims may experience shortness of breath and chest pain if the clot travels to the lungs (pulmonary embolism).
In addition to the Bard PowerPort complications mentioned above, patients with PowerPorts may experience other issues, such as:
Extravasation refers to the leakage of chemotherapy or contrast media into surrounding tissues.
Patients and healthcare providers must be vigilant in monitoring and maintaining these devices to prevent and address complications promptly.
While some symptoms may be specific to certain complications, there are some general signs to watch for.

If you have a Bard PowerPort implantable port, be on the lookout for the following symptoms and red flags:
Remember that these symptoms can vary in severity.
Management of complications often requires a team approach and can include strategies like antibiotic treatment and port removal for infections.
Regular flushing of the port with saline or heparin solution at least once every 4 weeks is essential to maintain patency.
It’s always better to be cautious and consult your healthcare provider if you experience these signs.
Early detection and intervention are vital to preventing severe complications.
The Bard PowerPort, manufactured by Bard Access Systems, Inc., is a medical device that has been at the center of controversy in recent years.
Numerous patients who have had this device implanted have reported experiencing severe complications, some of which resulted in life-threatening situations.
As a result, thousands of Bard Port Catheter Lawsuits have been filed against the manufacturers.
The Judicial Panel on Mulitidistrict Litigation (JPML) has consolidated the Bard PowerPort Lawsuits into multidistrict litigation (MDL) to streamline the process and ensure consistent decisions across the similar cases.

If you or a loved one have been injured by a Bard PowerPort device, you may be able to seek justice and compensation.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation and to get in touch with a Bard PowerPort Injury Lawyer.
Use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit instantly.
Visit this page for the latest Bard PowerPort Lawsuit updates.
Adverse event reports eventually reached the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and sparked an investigation into the safety of Bard PowerPort catheters.
As a result, the FDA issued a Class 2 recall for certain Bard PowerPort devices on March 26, 2020.
The Bard PowerPort recall stated that a manufacturing error caused the installation of the wrong tunneler tips.
This error could cause catheter fracture, migration, breakage, malfunction, difficulties during implantation or removal procedures, and other complications.
On February 18, 2022, the FDA terminated the Bard PowerPort recall, and there are currently no active recalls for these devices.
However, many patients have suffered severe complications and are seeking compensation for their injuries.
Numerous victims have filed Bard PowerPort lawsuits against Bard Access Systems, Inc. and its parent company, Becton Dickinson and Company.

The Bard PowerPort lawsuit allegations include three primary claims:
Plaintiffs in the Bard PowerPort catheter lawsuit also claim that the company failed to take appropriate action to remedy the situation and continued to market and sell these devices even after being aware of potential risks.
Instead, the manufacturer blamed healthcare providers for improper placement, implantation, and use of the device.
The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) consolidated and centralized the Bard PowerPort lawsuits into multidistrict litigation (MDL).
Multidistrict litigation (MDL) is a legal process that consolidates multiple civil cases from across different districts into one federal district court, streamlining pretrial proceedings for cases with common factual issues.
For individuals injured by the Bard PowerPort device, MDL can expedite the legal process, allowing for a more efficient resolution of numerous cases while maintaining individual lawsuit characteristics.

This process often entails bellwether trials, setting precedents and potentially guiding settlement discussions for all related cases.
Hon. David G. Campbell of the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona presides over the Bard PowerPort MDL (MDL 3081).
Judge Campbell scheduled the first case management conference on November 16, 2023, in the federal court for the District of Arizona.
The Bard PowerPort MDL is in its early stages, and Bard PowerPort injury lawyers expect the number of cases to grow in the coming months.
While there have been no settlements reached as of now, lawyers estimate that the average Bard PowerPort settlement could range between $10,000 to over $250,000, depending on the severity of injuries and other factors.

These estimates are merely projections based on prior results in product liability lawsuits.
These settlement projections are by no means a guarantee of financial compensation in the Bard PowerPort Lawsuit.
Reach out to an experienced Bard PowerPort Injury Lawyer for insight on your case.
If you or a loved one have experienced injuries or complications related to using a Bard PowerPort device, you may be eligible to file a Bard PowerPort lawsuit.

To determine if you qualify, consider the following steps:
Legal proceedings can be lengthy and complex, but they are essential in holding medical device manufacturers accountable for the safety of their products.
There may also be deadlines for filing a lawsuit, so it’s crucial to act quickly if you believe you have a case.
Our Bard PowerPort Injury Lawyers are here to help you seek justice and compensation for your injuries.
PowerPorts have significantly improved the quality of care for many patients, but they are not without their complications.
The Bard PowerPort implantable port catheter device has been linked to severe health problems, emotional distress, and complications.
Understanding the risks and symptoms associated with these devices is crucial for your health and well-being.

If you or a loved one have suffered complications from a Bard PowerPort implant, don’t hesitate to take action to protect your rights and seek the compensation you deserve.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit instantly.
Patients with Bard Power Port devices have reported a range of complications affecting the vascular system and surrounding tissues.
These reports form the basis of ongoing litigation and focus on injuries that extend beyond routine risks associated with implanted ports.
The complications vary in severity and often depend on how long the device remained implanted and how it performed over time.
Reported complications include:
These reported issues and other injuries are central to evaluating Bard PowerPort claims and understanding why many patients have pursued legal action.
If you experience any symptoms such as localized pain, swelling, difficulty with port access, or signs of infection, seek immediate medical attention.
It’s crucial to address these issues promptly to prevent more severe complications.
Contact an experienced Bard PowerPort Injury Lawyer for a free consultation to see if you qualify to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit.
You can use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to take action.
Filing a lawsuit can provide financial compensation for medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages.
Additionally, it can hold the manufacturer accountable and potentially lead to changes that improve patient safety.
Reach out to our Bard PowerPort Injury Lawyers for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit instantly.
The Bard PowerPort is commonly used in patients who require repeated or extended vascular access for medical care.
In many cases, a Bard implant port system implanted is selected for individuals undergoing long-term IV treatments, such as chemotherapy, infusion therapy, or nutritional support, where frequent access to central veins is necessary.
Because these devices are intended to remain in the body for months or years, their long-term safety and durability are critical considerations for both patients implanted with the device and healthcare providers injecting medications through them.
Patients have reported experiencing early symptoms before more serious complications were diagnosed, particularly when catheter integrity or placement was compromised.
These warning signs were not always immediately recognized as device-related, which sometimes delayed treatment.
In several cases, symptoms progressed gradually before escalating into more serious medical issues. Recognizing early changes is often critical to preventing further harm.
The Bard PowerPort lawsuit remains active in the federal multidistrict litigation pending in the District of Arizona as MDL No. 3081.
As of April 1, 2026, there were 3,044 pending actions in the MDL, and the first bellwether trial is scheduled to begin on April 21, 2026, which makes this litigation more advanced than many older page summaries suggest.
Court materials also show that the litigation is not limited to fracture claims alone, because the bellwether pool reflects infection, thrombus, and fracture cases involving this implanted device and related central venous catheter complications.
Yes.
Patients with a Bard PowerPort, port a cath, venous port, or other central venous catheter may report complications that go beyond catheter fracture or migration, including port erosion, implant area intolerance, bloodstream infection, clot formation near the superior vena cava, and difficulty obtaining blood samples or using the device for blood transfusions or other frequent IV treatments.
Some patients also report problems involving the catheter tunnel, pinch off syndrome, or serious injuries such as port pocket site perforation or an implanted device laceration, which in severe cases may require emergency surgery or urgent device removal.
The current litigation has developed around a wide range of alleged complications, which is one reason the Bard PowerPort MDL includes infection and thrombus cases in addition to fracture cases.
Owner & Attorney - TorHoerman Law
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?